The Collective Moral Autonomy Thesis: Reply to Ludwig and Miller

Journal of Social Philosophy 43 (1):78-95 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The argument from normative autonomy for collective agents.Kirk Ludwig - 2007 - Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (3):410–427.
The collective moral autonomy thesis.David Copp - 2007 - Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (3):369–388.
Against the collective moral autonomy thesis.Seumas Miller - 2007 - Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (3):389–409.
Limiting the scope of the weighting model: a reply to David Miller.Robert van der Veen - 2010 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (4):549-559.
Shared Agency: replies to Tenenbaum, Copp, and Schapiro.Michael E. Bratman - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (12):3409-3420.
David-Hillel Ruben’s 'Traditions and True Successors': A Critical Reply.John N. Williams - 2013 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (7):40-45.
Shahryari on Bloor and the Strong Program.Finn Collin - 2022 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (3):70-76.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-16

Downloads
80 (#261,703)

6 months
3 (#1,470,822)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Copp
University of California, Davis

References found in this work

Against the collective moral autonomy thesis.Seumas Miller - 2007 - Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (3):389–409.

Add more references