Frege on subject matter and identity statements

Analysis 75 (4):562-565 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In formulating the puzzle about cognitive significance in ‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung’, Frege rejects the approach he suggested in the Begriffsschrift on the ground that if the utterance of a sentence of the form a = b is understood as ‘a’ and ‘b’ referring to the same object we lose the subject matter. In this note, we will show how Frege’s concerns can be understood and circumvented

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-26

Downloads
161 (#144,709)

6 months
12 (#305,729)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Kepa Korta
University of Basque Country
Eros Corazza
University of the Basque Country

Citations of this work

Names, identity, and predication.Eros Corazza - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (10):2631-2647.
Why Did Frege Abandon the Metalinguistic Solution?Huiming Ren - 2024 - Philosophical Papers 52 (2):169-182.
Why Did Frege Abandon the Metalinguistic Solution?Huiming Ren - 2023 - Philosophical Papers 52 (2):169-182.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Uber Sinn und Bedeutung.Gottlob Frege - 1892 - Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Philosophische Kritik 100 (1):25-50.
Critical Pragmatics: An Inquiry Into Reference and Communication.Kepa Korta & John Perry - 2011 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by John Perry.
Frege on identity, cognitive value, and subject matter.John Perry - 2019 - In Studies in language and information. Stanford, California: Center for the Study of Language and Information.

Add more references