" What is familiar is not understood precisely because it is familiar" a re-examination of McDowell's quietism

Verifiche: Rivista Trimestrale di Scienze Umane 41 (1-3):103-127 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The essay’s main goal is to see what connection (if any) may be drawn between McDowell’s theoretical quietism and Hegel’s idea of philosophy. McDowell’s view is explicitly rooted in Wittgenstein’s belief that «philosophy leaves everything as it is» and that its task only «consists in assembling reminders for a particular purpose», but it may be interesting to investigate whether this quietism, as he has recently reiterated, is merely «Wittgensteinian» or has a broader import. The issue is approached «sideways on». The essay starts with a discussion of David Foster Wallace’s view that «the most obvious, ubiquitous, important realities are often the ones that are hardest to see and talk about» and it bridges the gap between Hegel and McDowell’s Wittgensteinianism by resorting to an examination of Charles Taylor’s «qualitative conception of action».

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,553

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intentionality and Content in McDowell.Patrice Philie - 2016 - Metaphilosophy 47 (4-5):656-678.
Quietist Elements in Adorno.Christian Lamp - forthcoming - European Journal of Philosophy.
John Mcdowell.Timothy Thornton (ed.) - 2004 - New York: Routledge.
Bildung, Meaning, and Reasons.Matteo Bianchin - 2012 - Verifiche: Rivista Trimestrale di Scienze Umane 41 (1-3):73-102.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-31

Downloads
49 (#454,852)

6 months
8 (#633,132)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references