- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Assessing the New Testament Evidence for the Historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus
Mellen Press (1989)
Abstract
This text draws on the evidence of Paul and the Gospels to present the case for accepting the historicity of the bodily resurrection of Jesus.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Is There Sufficient Historical Evidence to Establish the Resurrection of Jesus?Robert Greg Cavin - 1995 - Faith and Philosophy 12 (3):361-379.
Was Jesus Raised Bodily?Stephen T. Davis - 2006 - In Christian Philosophical Theology. New York: Oxford University Press UK.
Assessing the Resurrection Hypothesis: Problems with Craig's Inference to the Best Explanation.Robert Greg Cavin & Carlos A. Colombetti - 2019 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11 (2):205-228.
The ultimate miracle? The historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus.Marcel Sarot - 2014 - HTS Theological Studies 70 (1).
The Resurrection of Jesus and Rational Apologetics.Dale C. Allison - 2008 - Philosophia Christi 10 (2):315-335.
A philosophical and historical analysis of William Lane Craig's resurrection of Jesus argument.Raphael Lataster - 2015 - Think 14 (39):59-71.
Inference to the Best Explanation and Rejecting the Resurrection.David Kyle Johnson - 2021 - Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry 3 (1):26-51.
Replies to Evan Fales: On the Evidence of Miracles and the Historicity of the Resurrection.R. Douglas Geivett - 2001 - Philosophia Christi 3 (1):53 - 60.
Craig on the Resurrection: A Defense.Stephen T. Davis - 2020 - Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry 2 (1):28-35.
Evidence, Miracles, and the Existence of Jesus: Comments on Stephen Law.Robert Greg Cavin & Carlos A. Colombetti - 2014 - Faith and Philosophy 31 (2):204-216.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-06-19
Downloads
42 (#533,951)
6 months
3 (#1,473,720)
2012-06-19
Downloads
42 (#533,951)
6 months
3 (#1,473,720)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Argument from Miracles: A Cumulative Case for the Resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth.Timothy McGrew & Lydia McGrew - 2009 - In William Lane Craig & J. P. Moreland (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 593--662.
Assessing the Resurrection Hypothesis: Problems with Craig's Inference to the Best Explanation.Robert Greg Cavin & Carlos A. Colombetti - 2019 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11 (2):205-228.
Pragmatic encroachment, stakes, and religious knowledge.Aaron Rizzieri - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 70 (3):217-229.
On Roach’s Presuppositional Response to Licona’s New Historiographical Approach.Michael R. Licona & Jacobus Erasmus - 2021 - Perichoresis 19 (4):21-33.
Houston, Do We Have a Problem?C. A. McIntosh & Tyler Dalton McNabb - 2021 - Philosophia Christi 23 (1):101-124.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-2pm92 dc2