Omniscience, Tensed Facts, and Divine Eternity

Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):227--228 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A difficulty for a view of divine eternity as timelessness is that if time is tensed, then God, in virtue of His omniscience, must know tensed facts. But tensed facts, such as It is now t, can only be known by a temporally located being.Defenders of divine atemporality may attempt to escape the force of this argument by contending either that a timeless being can know tensed facts or else that ignorance of tensed facts is compatible with divine omniscience. Kvanvig, Wierenga, and Leftow adopt both of these strategies in their various defenses of divine timelessness. Their respective solutions are analyzed in detail and shown to be untenable.Thus, if the theist holds to a tensed view of time, he should construe divine eternity in terms of omnitemporality

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Divine eternity.William Lane Craig - 2008 - In Thomas P. Flint & Michael Rea (eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophical theology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Summary and Conclusions.Michael Tooley - 1997 - In Time, Tense, and Causation. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Eternal God: A Study of God Without Time.Paul Helm - 1988 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Tensed Facts and the Fittingness of our Attitudes 1.Kristie Miller - 2022 - Philosophical Perspectives 36 (1):216-232.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-29

Downloads
174 (#134,875)

6 months
26 (#121,864)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Lane Craig
Houston Baptist University

Citations of this work

The divine attributes.Nicholas Everitt - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (1):78-90.
Impossibility Arguments.Patrick Grim - 2006 - In Michael Martin (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. Cambridge University Press. pp. 199--214.
Omniscience and Eternity: A Reply to Craig.Jonathan L. Kvanvig - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (3):369-376.
Omniscience and Time, One More Time.Edward Wierenga - 2004 - Faith and Philosophy 21 (1):90-97.
Kvanvig No A-Theorist.William Lane Craig - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (3):377-380.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Eternity.Eleonore Stump & Norman Kretzmann - 1981 - Journal of Philosophy 78 (8):429-458.
Eternity and Simultaneity.Brian Leftow - 1991 - Faith and Philosophy 8 (2):148-179.

Add more references