A defence of the no-minimum response to the problem of evil: Andrew cullison

Religious Studies 47 (1):121-123 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I defend Peter van Inwagen's no-minimum response to the problem of evil from a recent objection raised by Jeff Jordan

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,634

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-30

Downloads
83 (#266,214)

6 months
8 (#482,871)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andy Cullison
DePauw University

Citations of this work

Vagueness and the Problem of Evil: a New Reply to van Inwagen.Luis Oliveira - 2021 - Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 44 (4):49-82.
Is the no-minimum claim true? Reply to Cullison.Jeff Jordan - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (1):125 - 127.
God and Gratuitous Evil (Part II).Klaas J. Kraay - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (12):913-922.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.William L. Rowe - 1979 - American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (4):335 - 341.
Evil and Van Inwagen.Jeff Jordan - 2003 - Faith and Philosophy 20 (2):236-239.

Add more references