Diamond and antichains

Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (1):71-76 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is obvious that ♦ implies the existence of an antichain of stationary sets of cardinality which is the largest possible cardinality. We show that the obvious antichain is not maximal and find a less obvious extension of it by ℵ2 more stationary sets

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,856

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Families of sets related to Rosenthal’s lemma.Damian Sobota - 2019 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 58 (1-2):53-69.
Diamond principles in Cichoń’s diagram.Hiroaki Minami - 2005 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (4):513-526.
I0I_0 and combinatorics at λ+\lambda ^+.Nam Trang & Xianghui Shi - 2017 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 56 (1):131-154.
Positive logics.Saharon Shelah & Jouko Väänänen - 2023 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 62 (1):207-223.
Middle diamond.Saharon Shelah - 2005 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (5):527-560.
SH plus CH does not imply stationary antichains.Chaz Schlindwein - 2003 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 124 (1-3):233-265.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-23

Downloads
38 (#659,237)

6 months
10 (#388,931)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references