Saying what we mean: an argument against expressivism

In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics: Volume 1. Clarendon Press (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

original Cuneo, Terrence (2006) "“Saying what we Mean: An Argument against Expressivism". Oxford Studies in Metaethics 1():35-71

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-10

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

After Moral Error Theory, After Moral Realism.Stephen Ingram - 2015 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 53 (2):227-248.
Rascals, Triflers, and Pragmatists: Developing a Peircean Account of Assertion.Kenneth Boyd & Diana Heney - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (2):1-22.
The Phenomenological Objection to Fictionalism.Stuart Brock - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (3):574-592.
Moral assertion for expressivists.Mike Ridge - 2009 - Philosophical Issues 19 (1):182-204.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references