- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Germline Modification and Policymaking: The Relationship between Mitochondrial Replacement and Gene Editing
The New Bioethics 24 (1):74-94 (2018)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Altered Inheritance: CRISPR and the Ethics of Human Genome Editing.Donna Dickenson - 2020 - The New Bioethics 26 (1):75-77.
CRISPR/Cas9 and Germline Modification: New Difficulties in Obtaining Informed Consent.Joanna Smolenski - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):35-37.
Crossing the Germline Barrier: The Three Genome Baby.Sheldon Krimsky - 2015 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 6 (3-4):237-261.
Germline gene editing and the precautionary principle.Julian J. Koplin, Christopher Gyngell & Julian Savulescu - 2019 - Bioethics 34 (1):49-59.
Is Mitochondrial Donation Germ‐Line Gene Therapy? Classifications and Ethical Implications.Anthony Wrigley & Ainsley J. Newson - 2016 - Bioethics 31 (1):55-67.
Revising, Correcting, and Transferring Genes.Bryan Cwik - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):7-18.
Clinical trials of germline gene editing: The exploitation problem.Erik Malmqvist - 2021 - Bioethics 35 (7):688-695.
From goodness to good looks: Changing images of human germline genetic modification.Derek So - 2021 - Bioethics 36 (5):556-568.
The benefits, risks and alternatives of mitochondrial replacement therapy – bringing proportionality into public policy debate.Gregory K. Pike - 2022 - Clinical Ethics 17 (4):368-376.
Did a permissive scientific culture encourage the 'CRISPR babies' experiment?Donna Dickenson & Marcy Darnovsky - 2019 - Nature Biotechnology 27:350-369.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-03-13
Downloads
31 (#725,454)
6 months
13 (#253,952)
2018-03-13
Downloads
31 (#725,454)
6 months
13 (#253,952)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
He Jiankui´s gene‐editing experiment and the non‐identity problem.Marcos Alonso & Julian Savulescu - 2021 - Bioethics 35 (6):563-573.
The benefits, risks and alternatives of mitochondrial replacement therapy – bringing proportionality into public policy debate.Gregory K. Pike - 2022 - Clinical Ethics 17 (4):368-376.
References found in this work
Convention for protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and biomedicine: Convention on human rights and biomedicine.Council of Europe - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (3):277-290.
Human Nuclear Genome Transfer : Clearing the Underbrush.Françoise Baylis - 2016 - Bioethics 31 (1):7-19.
Is Mitochondrial Donation Germ‐Line Gene Therapy? Classifications and Ethical Implications.Anthony Wrigley & Ainsley J. Newson - 2016 - Bioethics 31 (1):55-67.
Universal Declaration On The Human Genome and Human Rights: The General Conference.[author unknown] - 1997 - Diogenes 45 (180):183-191.
Mitochondrial Replacement Techniques, Scientific Tourism, and the Global Politics of Science.Sarah Chan, César Palacios-González & María De Jesús Medina Arellano - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (5):7-9.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-7qg25 dc2