Quantum tunneling times: A crucial test for the causal program? [Book Review]

Foundations of Physics 25 (2):269-280 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is generally believed that Bohm's version of quantum mechanics is observationally equivalent to standard quantum mechanics. A more careful statement is that the two theories will always make the same predictions for any question or problem that is well posed in both interpretations. The transit time of a “particle” between two points in space is not necessarily well defined in standard quantum mechanics, whereas it is in Bohm's theory since there is always a particle following a definite trajectory. For this reason tunneling times (in a scattering configuration through a potential barrier may be a situation in which Bohm's theory can make a definite prediction when standard quantum mechanics can make none at all. I summarize some of the theoretical and experimental prospects for an unambiguous comparison in the hope that this question will engage the attention of more physicists, especially those experimentalists who now routinely actually do gedanken experiments

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
55 (#394,409)

6 months
9 (#497,927)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Antidote or Theory?Michael Dickson - 1996 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27 (2):229-238.
On the status of quantum tunnelling time.Grace E. Field - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12 (4):1-30.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Causality and Chance in Modern Physics.David Bohm - 1960 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (40):321-338.

Add more references