Three Angry Men

Phables (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A short play wherein three pregnant (previously) anti-abortion men consider the arguments for and against abortion.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Dawn of the Future-Like-Ours Argument Against Abortion.Gianluca Di Muzio - 2021 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 35 (2):209-226.
Strengthened impairment argument does not restate Marquis.Bruce Philip Blackshaw - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (12):841-842.
Abortion and the Epicurean challenge.Karl Ekendahl - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (4):273-274.
Future‐like‐ours as a metaphysical reductio ad absurdum argument of personal identity.Tomer Jordi Chaffer - 2023 - Bioethics 37 (4):367-373.
Animalism, Abortion, and a Future Like Ours.Andrea Sauchelli - 2019 - The Journal of Ethics 23 (3):317-332.
The parenthood argument.William Simkulet - 2017 - Bioethics 32 (1):10-15.
The "future like ours" argument and human embryonic stem cell research.A. Kuflik - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (6):417-421.
Boonin on the future-like-ours argument against abortion.Pedro Galvão - 2007 - Bioethics 21 (6):324–328.
Abortion and deprivation: a reply to Marquis.Anna Christensen - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (1):22-25.
Reply to Di Nucci: why the counterexamples succeed.C. Strong - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):326-327.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-09-08

Downloads
361 (#83,010)

6 months
86 (#75,178)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Simon Cushing
University of Michigan - Flint

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references