How we avoid collisions with stationary and moving objects

, &
Psychological Review 102 (4):627-651 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/0033-295x.102.4.627

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review of Peter M. Harman: The Natural Philosophy of James Clerk Maxwell. [REVIEW]Raffaella Santi - 2005 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 3 (2):196-197.
Visual Representation in the Wild: How Rhesus Monkeys.Elizabeth S. Spelke & Marc D. Hauser - unknown
James E. Tomberlin and Peter van Inwagen, eds., Alvin Plantinga Reviewed by.John King-Farlow - 1986 - Philosophy in Review 6 (1):38-41.
Book review: James Paul Gee, An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method and James Paul Gee, How to Do Discourse Analysis: A Toolkit. [REVIEW]Daria Dayter - 2015 - Discourse Studies 17 (6):772-774.
Collision Detection by Four-dimensional Intersection Testing.Stephen Cameron - 1990
What Emotions Really Are: The Problem of Psychological Categories.Paul E. Griffiths - 1997 - University of Chicago Press.
Organic and tight.J. Cummings, M. Foreman & E. Schimmerling - 2009 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 160 (1):22-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
19 (#1,068,182)

6 months
7 (#652,610)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references