Attitudes Towards Preconception Sex Selection: A Representative Survey from Germany

Reproductive Biomedicine Online 9 (6):600-603 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Within the next parliamentary term, the German government is expected to replace the current Embryo Protection Act with a new Human Reproductive Technology Act. Before introducing new legislation, policy makers may want to survey public attitudes towards novel applications of reproductive technology. In order to assess opinions and concerns about preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons, a social survey has been conducted in Germany. As a representative sample of the German population, 1005 men and women 18 years and older were asked whether or not preconception sex selection should be made available. Of the respondents, 32% held that sex selection should be strictly prohibited, be it for medical or non-medical reasons, and 54% accepted the use of preconception sex selection for medical purposes. Only a minority of 11% approved of the use of preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons. The widespread opposition to a freely available service for non-medical sex selection is based on several claims: 87% of respondents hold that 'children are a gift and deserve to be loved regardless of any characteristics such as beauty, intelligence or sex'; 79% argue that choosing the sex of children is 'playing God'; 76% are opposed because it is seen as 'unnatural'; 49% are afraid that it is 'skewing the natural sex ratio'; and 40% consider it to be 'sexist'.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Procreative Liberty: The Case for Preconception Sex Selection.Edgar Dahl - 2003 - Reproductive Biomedicine Online 7 (4):380-384.
Sex Selection In Indonesia: An Ethical and Legal Perspective.Rani Tiyas Budiyanti, Adi Sulistiyono & Pujiyono - 2017 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 27 (1):19-21.
Why sex selection should be legal.David McCarthy - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (5):302-307.
Is Preconception Sex Selection Necessarily Sexist?Laura Purdy - 2007 - Reproductive Biomedicine Online 15 (Supp. 2):33-37.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-10

Downloads
470 (#60,674)

6 months
83 (#74,761)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Edgar Dahl
Universität Giessen

References found in this work

The Presumption in Favour of Liberty.Edgar Dahl - 2004 - Reproductive Biomedicine Online 8 (3):266-267.

Add more references