The Paradigm of Justice: A Contemporary Debate Between John Rawls and Amartya Sen

Routledge (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book deals with the fascinating debate over the concept of justice proposed by two contemporary thinkers, namely, John Rawls and Amartya Sen. Justice means what is just, but how do we know what is just? What would be the viable criterion to legitimize justice? Is justice objective or subjective? Is justice a matter of ontological issue or an issue of realization? What would be the paradigm of justice? These are some important issues discussed in the book. Please note: Taylor & Francis does not sell or distribute the Hardback in India, Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Justice Implicit: The Pragmatism of Amartya Sen.Jason Hannan - 2015 - Contemporary Pragmatism 12 (2):317-339.
For a Feasible Justice: the Comparative Approach of Amartya Sen.Fábio Creder - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 69:93-97.
Ideals of justice: goals vs. constraints.Anthony Simon Laden - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (2):205-219.
In defense of transcendental institutionalism.James Gledhill - 2014 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 40 (7):665-682.
On Sen on comparative justice.Chandran Kukathas - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (2):196-204.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-21

Downloads
7 (#1,637,090)

6 months
2 (#1,685,182)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references