Abstract

The question of transcendence, as it is understood in the perspective of the husserlian transcendental phenomenology, is the preliminary to any questioning about knowledge. How is it possible to grasp something? What is the proof of the reality of what is grasped? These are the questions on the basis of which we can determine a primary idea of transcendence understood as a “going beyond of oneself in the direction of things”. What is in question here does not concern the going beyond in itself, but this undetermined self, the being who performs the « transcending ». Modern philosophy since Descartes understands this being as a “consciousness” or a “ subject ”. Sartre remains in the same perspective, whereas Heidegger breaks in a decisive manner with it. This is what is at stake here: the confrontation of the heideggerian notion of Dasein with the sartrian philosophy of consciousness. Sartre elabores in Being and Nothingness a philosophy of consciousness in spite of the fact that in the preceding years he had begun the reading of Being and Time, in which it is clear that Heidegger wants precisely to get over the notion of consciousness. Being and Nothingness is nevertheless deeply marked by the influence of Heidegger, so that one can see in it a discussion of Being and Time. One may even consider that Sartre’s “fruitful misinterpretation” of Heidegger ’s major work was the very origin of Being and Nothingness. But the best way to decide if this misinterpretation was really fruitful is to try to compare the heideggerian and sartrian understanding of transcendence