A Defence of Mathematical Pluralism

Philosophia Mathematica 13 (3):252-276 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We approach the philosophy of mathematics via a discussion of the differences between classical mathematics and constructive mathematics, arguing that each is a valid activity within its own context.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An intuitionistic interpretation of Bishop’s philosophy.Bruno Bentzen - 2024 - Philosophia Mathematica 32 (3):307-331.
Intentional mathematics.Stewart Shapiro (ed.) - 1985 - New YorK, N.Y., U.S.A.: Sole distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..
Did Bishop have a philosophy of mathematics?Helen Billinge - 2003 - Philosophia Mathematica 11 (2):176-194.
On Constructive Groups.V. A. Lifshits - 1969 - In A. O. Slisenko (ed.), Studies in constructive mathematics and mathematical logic. New York,: Consultants Bureau. pp. 32--35.
Questioning Constructive Reverse Mathematics.I. Loeb - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 7 (2):131-140.
Changes of language in the development of mathematics.Ladislav Kvasz - 2000 - Philosophia Mathematica 8 (1):47-83.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
210 (#118,721)

6 months
25 (#123,699)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Mathematical Pluralism.Edward N. Zalta - 2024 - Noûs 58 (2):306-332.
Mathematical pluralism.G. Priest - 2013 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 21 (1):4-13.
Mathematical Pluralism and Platonism.Mark Balaguer - 2017 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 34 (2):379-398.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references