Compassionate Exclusivism: Relational Atonement and Post-Mortem Salvation

Journal of Analytic Theology 9:158-179 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Faithful persons tend to relate to their religious beliefs as truth claims, particularly inasmuch as their beliefs have soteriological implications for those of different religions. For Christians the particular claims which matter most in this regard are those made by Jesus of Nazareth and his claims are primarily relational in nature. I propose a model in which we understand divine grace from Jesus as being mediated through relational knowledge of him on a compassionately exclusivist basis, including post-mortem. Supporting this model, I draw from Eleonore Stump’s hypothesis in her 2018 Atonement that the crucifixion of Jesus opens the divine psyche to all human psyches sufficiently for salvific mutual indwelling to occur, and from Gavin D’Costa’s conception of the descensus Christi ad inferos as the mechanism for grace’s accessibility post-mortem presented in his 2009 Christianity and World Religions. This model seeks to address ongoing, justified pastoral concern for the soteriological status of non-Christians while still treating Christianity as objectively true.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-23

Downloads
561 (#52,211)

6 months
163 (#26,470)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aaron Davis
University of St. Andrews

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Atonement.Eleonore Stump - 2018 - Oxford University Press.
Epistemology Personalized.Matthew A. Benton - 2017 - Philosophical Quarterly 67 (269):813-834.
Know How and Acts of Faith.Paulina Sliwa - 2018 - In Matthew A. Benton, John Hawthorne & Dani Rabinowitz, Knowledge, Belief, and God: New Insights in Religious Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 246-263.

View all 13 references / Add more references