Setting penalties: What does rape deserve? [Book Review]

Law and Philosophy 3 (1):61 - 110 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper is an application of the principle of just deserts (that is, retribution) to the setting of statutory penalties. The conclusion is that there should be no separate penalty for rape but that rape should be punished under the ordinary battery statutes. The argument has four parts. First, there is a description of the place of rape in a typical statutory scheme. Second, there is a consideration of possible justifications for giving rape the status it has in such a typical scheme. All justifications appear to fail for one reason or another. Third, rape is analyzed as battery and the analysis is justified. This analysis includes an explanation of why it would be unjust to punish rape more severely than ordinary batteries. Last, there is a catalogue of some practical advantages to treating rape as battery (for example, simplifying proof of the crime). The paper takes the principle of just deserts (in the form I have elsewhere defended it) for granted, but does add substantially to the understanding of how to apply it.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can a Woman Rape a Man and Why Does It Matter?Natasha McKeever - 2019 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 13 (4):599-619.
Simple rape and the risks of sex.George E. Panichas - 2006 - Law and Philosophy 25 (6):613 - 661.
Reconsidering Rape: Rethinking the Conceptual Foundations of Rape Law.John Bogart - 1995 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 8 (1):159-82.
The Rhetoric of Rape Through the Lens of Commonwealth V. Berkowitz.Kathryn Stanchi - 2024 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 37 (2):359-378.
Sexual specificity, rape law reform and the feminist quest for justice.Louise du Toit - 2012 - South African Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):465-483.
Rape Myths: What are They and What can We do About Them?Katharine Jenkins - 2021 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 89:37-49.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
97 (#217,682)

6 months
2 (#1,685,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Davis
Illinois Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

The wrong of rape.David Archard - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):374–393.
Rape and Persuasive Definition.Keith Burgess-Jackson - 1995 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):415 - 454.
Rethinking the presumption of atheism.Keith Burgess-Jackson - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 84 (1):93-111.
Can a Woman Rape a Man and Why Does It Matter?Natasha McKeever - 2019 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 13 (4):599-619.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references