The Problem of Intersubjectivity in Husserlian Phenomenology

Dissertation, Georgetown University (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The problem of the Other remains a source of conflict and confusion in phenomenology. Edmund Husserl's project for a phenomenology which functions as a transcendental philosophy has been persistently haunted by the suspicion that his methodological commitment to the conscious life of the transcendental ego confines his procedure to the immanent processes of a solus ipse and thus prevents transcendental phenomenology from presenting a legitimate account of the objective world as an intersubjectively available world. ;A clear presentation of what Husserl is doing when he tackles the problem of the Other is lacking in Husserlian scholarship. This study seeks to fill this gap by examining Husserl's account of the intersubjectivity issue, especially in terms of the Fifth Cartesian Meditation. The result, in accord with Husserl's direction to provide a presuppositionless description of the "things themselves," is a faithful exposition of this crucial aspect of Husserl's transcendental phenomenological project. ;Once the function of inner time-consciousness in the life of the ego is correctly understood, the ego is seen as an intentional matrix transcending itself toward the world. This conception of the ego redirects the meaning of the problem of the Other. Husserl does not need to demonstrate the existence of other egos on the basis of the transcendental ego. As the ego is its intentional life, it lives with Others in an intentional relationship--the relationship which founds objective knowledge. Accordingly, what Husserl needs to do is to intentionally explicate the coming to presence of one ego for another. Via the transcendental epoche the positive givenness of empathy becomes a thing of wonder and I am able to ask about the how of this givenness, i.e., I undertake a transcendental analysis with respect to the conditions of possibility for such an experience. Three conclusions are reached: the transcendental ego is not only a legitimate phenomenological discovery but its structural dynamics show it to be an open field of intentionality transcending itself toward the Other; this transcendental field is intersubjective in nature; and Husserl's commitment to transcendental egology is a result of his phenomenological description of transcendental empathy

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,774

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intersubjectivity in life world of Husserl's phenomenology.Fahad Hayavi - 2011 - Philosophical Investigations: Islamic Azad University, Science andResearch Branch 7 (19):103-135.
Intersubjectivity in Husserl’s Work.Alexander Schnell - 2010 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 2 (1):9-32.
Intersubjectivity: Husserl and Merleau-Ponty.Cheng-yun Tsai - 1989 - Dissertation, Duquesne University
Husserl's Transcendental Idealism and the Problem of Solipsism.Rodney Parker - 2013 - Dissertation, University of Western Ontario
Who Is the Subject of Phenomenology? Husserl and Fink on the Transcendental Ego.D. J. Hobbs - 2018 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 50 (2):154-169.
Bergson's and Sartre's account of the self in relation to the transcendental ego.Roland Breeur - 2001 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 9 (2):177 – 198.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
1 (#2,003,877)

6 months
1 (#1,945,873)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references