Increasing the amount of payment to research subjects

Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):e14-e14 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article discusses some ethical issues that can arise when researchers decide to increase the amount of payment offered to research subjects to boost enrollment. Would increasing the amount of payment be unfair to subjects who have already consented to participate in the study? This article considers how five different models of payment—the free market model, the wage payment model, the reimbursement model, the appreciation model, and the fair benefits model—would approach this issue. The article also considers several practical problems related to changing the amount of payment, including determining whether there is enough money in the budget to offer additional payments to subjects who have already enrolled, ascertaining how difficult it will be to re-contact subjects, and developing a plan of action for responding to subjects who find out they are receiving less money and demand an explanation

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Living Wage for Research Subjects.Trisha B. Phillips - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (2):243-253.
Payments to research subjects.Martin Wilkinson - 2005 - Monash Bioethics Review 24 (1):S70-S77.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
48 (#458,202)

6 months
10 (#407,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Kidney Sales and Market Regulation: A Reply to Semrau.J. Koplin Julian - 2017 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 42 (6):653-669.
Correspondence.[author unknown] - 2009 - Research Ethics 5 (1):37-39.

Add more citations