On right and good: The problem of objective right: Journal of philosophical studies

Philosophy 5 (19):422-434 (1930)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We have been led by our preliminary survey to acknowledge the autonomy of the moral life. The Tightness of an action is something that is sui generis and ultimate. It is vain to seek a reason for the rightness other than the Tightness itself. To the question, “Why ought I to do what I ought?” the only answer is, “Because I ought to do it.” 1 It is with rightness as with truth: Vera idea est norma sui et falsi. In any moral situation, we intuitively judge what it is right to do, and in judging recognize that the obligation to do it is unconditional. That we possess this capacity is what is meant by saying that we are moral beings.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Manuscript on Morals.H. A. Prichard - 2002 - In H. A. Prichard (ed.), Moral writings. New York: Oxford University Press.
Why Should I Be Moral?D. A. Lloyd Thomas - 1970 - Philosophy 45 (172):128 - 139.
The Universalizability of Moral Judgements.Peter Winch - 1965 - The Monist 49 (2):196-214.
Moral conflict and moral realism.Torbjörn Tännsjö - 1985 - Journal of Philosophy 82 (3):113-117.
Education for citizenship: moral obligations.Okafor Oliver Anowor - 1992 - Enugu, Nigeria: Cecta. Edited by Louis C. Asiegbu.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-21

Downloads
10 (#1,466,946)

6 months
5 (#1,035,390)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

XI.—The Nature of Morally Good Action.W. D. Ross - 1929 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 29 (1):251-274.

Add more references