Autographic and allographic aspects of ritual

Philosophia 29 (1-4):133-147 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper continues Israel Scheffler's investigation of rituals as autographic/allographic. It concludes that the autographic/allographic distinction is more fruitfully applied to rituals as a gradual distinction, distinguishing rituals in terms of their autographic/allographic elements or aspects.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,343

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Preserving the Autographic/Allographic Distinction.Jason D'cruz & P. D. Magnus - 2015 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73 (4):453-457.
Are Digital Images Allographic?Jason D'cruz & P. D. Magnus - 2014 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 72 (4):417-427.
On goodman’s autographic/allographic distinction.Jesper Ryberg - 1998 - Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 33 (1):71-83.
Nelson Goodman's Autographic-Allographic.Remei Capdevila Werning - 2009 - In Gerhard Ernst, Jakob Steinbrenner & Oliver R. Scholz, From Logic to Art: Themes from Nelson Goodman. Frankfurt: Ontos. pp. 269.
Autographic and allographic art revisited.Jerrold Levinson - 1980 - Philosophical Studies 38 (4):367 - 383.
N. Goodman, Jazyky umění: Nástin teorie symbolů. [REVIEW]Tomas Hribek - 2008 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 15 (2):273-278.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
130 (#173,394)

6 months
8 (#390,329)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Rafael De Clercq
Lingnan University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references