The Autonomy of the Democratic State: Rejoinder to Carpenter, Ginsberg, and Shefter

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 19 (1):187-196 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT While democratic states may manipulate public opinion and mobilize society to serve their interests, a focus on such active efforts may distract us from the passive, default condition of ignorance‐based state autonomy. The electorate’s ignorance ensures that most of what modern states do is unknown to “society,” and thus need not even acquire social approval, whether manipulated or spontaneous. Similarly, suggestions that democratic states may be “captured” by societal groups must take cognizance of the factors that enable elites to serve the interests of specific societal groups at the expense of the larger society. Bringing studies of voter ignorance into the analysis of state’s autonomy from society provides a novel approach to the study of democratic states’ autonomy, while also serving to explain how societal “capture” of state policies is possible.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bringing the state back in … again.Samuel DeCanio - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (2-3):139-146.
Beyond marxist state theory: State autonomy in democratic societies.Samuel DeCanio - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (2-3):215-236.
Autonomy and Duplicity: Reply to DeCanio.Benjamin Ginsberg - 2007 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 19 (1):165-180.
Mass opinion and American political development.Samuel DeCanio - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (1-3):143-155.
Democracy and ignorance: Reply to Friedman.Robert B. Talisse - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (4):453-466.
State autonomy & civil society: The lobbyist connection.Rogan Kersh - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (2-3):237-258.
Regulation, politics, and interest groups: What do we learn from an historical approach? [REVIEW]Steven M. Sheffrin - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (2-3):259-269.
Why the state was dropped in the first place: A prequel to Skocpol's “bringing the state back in”.David Ciepley - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (2-3):157-213.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
24 (#912,262)

6 months
9 (#492,507)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Political Epistemology.Jeffrey Friedman - 2014 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 26 (1-2):i-xiv.
Roundtable on Political Epistemology.Scott Althaus, Mark Bevir, Jeffrey Friedman, Hélène Landemore, Rogers Smith & Susan Stokes - 2014 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 26 (1-2):1-32.
What’s Empire Got to Do with It? The Derivation of America’s Foreign Policy.Earl C. Ravenal - 2009 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 21 (1):21-75.
Value representation—the dominance of ends over means in democratic politics: Reply to Murakami.Morgan Marietta - 2010 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 22 (2):311-329.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Public Opinion.Charles E. Merriam - 1946 - Philosophical Review 55:497.
Popper, Weber, and Hayek: The epistemology and politics of ignorance.Jeffrey Friedman - 2005 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 17 (1-2):1-58.
Bringing the state back in … again.Samuel DeCanio - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (2-3):139-146.
Beyond marxist state theory: State autonomy in democratic societies.Samuel DeCanio - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (2-3):215-236.

View all 7 references / Add more references