The Itself

Idealistic Studies 5 (1):59-69 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Suppose that someone wishes to characterize God as the independent, the creature as the totally dependent. Or suppose that someone wishes to work out in general the implications of the independent vis-à-vis the totally dependent. I take total dependence to entail that B is dependent upon A, but that A is independent of B, that B is dependent on nothing else than A, and that there is nothing in B which is independent of A. Are there other logical patterns which are legitimate renderings of, or at least compatible with, independence: total dependence?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Itself.John N. Deck - 1975 - Idealistic Studies 5 (1):59-69.
Can a thing be part of itself?Stephen Kearns - 2011 - American Philosophical Quarterly (1):87.
Vorhandenheit and Heidegger’s Predicament over Being-In-Itself.Anthony D. Traylor - 2014 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 88 (3):439-464.
The dialogue of the soul with itself.James A. Blachowicz - 1997 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 4 (5-6):485-508.
The Self is a Relation That Relates Itself to Itself.Gordon Marino - 2019 - The Philosophers' Magazine 84:71-76.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
48 (#461,675)

6 months
17 (#177,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references