Lost in Translation: Gaps in Reasoning for Primate Stroke

American Journal of Bioethics 9 (5):23-25 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Primate Stroke Research: Still Not Interested.Monica L. Gerrek - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (5):29-30.
Lost in Translation—Bridging Gaps through Procedural Norms.Kurt W. Schmidt - 2006 - In Hugo Tristram Engelhardt (ed.), Global bioethics: the collapse of consensus. Salem, MA: M & M Scrivener Press. pp. 180.
Lost in translation: Religious arguments made secular.Carson Strong - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):29 – 31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
26 (#884,419)

6 months
3 (#1,102,499)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Animal Liberation.Peter Singer (ed.) - 1977 - Avon Books.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2004 - Univ of California Press.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
Animal Liberation.Bill Puka & Peter Singer - 1977 - Philosophical Review 86 (4):557.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1985 - Human Studies 8 (4):389-392.

View all 13 references / Add more references