- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Putnam's Model‐Theoretic Argument
In Steven D. Hales (ed.), A Companion to Relativism. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 569–587 (2010)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: Abstract The Model ‐ Theoretic Argument Difficulties and Differences Putnam's Progress Implications Objections and Replies References.Author's Profile
The Model ‐ Theoretic Argument putnam's model‐theoretic argument Interpretations can be distinguished roughly into three groups “Realism and reason” “Models and reality” “non ‐ realist semantics” Putnam then extends the argument to cover Another cause of difficulty is Putnam's own style “the model‐theoretic argument”
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Putnam’s Model-Theoretic Argument Reconstructed.Igor Douven - 1999 - Journal of Philosophy 96 (9):479-490.
Putnam’s Model-Theoretic Argument Reconstructed.Igor Douven - 1999 - Journal of Philosophy 96 (9):479-490.
Putnam's model-theoretic argument against metaphysical realism.Bob Hale & Crispin Wright - 1997 - In Bob Hale, Crispin Wright & Alexander Miller (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 427--57.
Putnam's Model-Theoretic Argument Against Metaphysical Realism.Anthony L. Brueckner - 1984 - Analysis 44 (3):134--40.
Van Fraassen's dissolution of Putnam's model-theoretic argument.Mathias Frisch - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (1):158-164.
A note on global descriptivism and Putnam's model-theoretic argument.Igor Douven - 1999 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (3):342 – 348.
Putnam's model-theoretic argument, natural realism, and the standard conception of theories.Gregory Landini - 1987 - Philosophical Papers 16 (3):209-233.
Putnam's model-theoretic argument(s). A detailed reconstruction.Jürgen Dümont - 1999 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 30 (2):341-364.
'Just more theory': A manoeuvre in Putnam's model-theoretic argument for antirealism.Barry Taylor - 1991 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69 (2):152 – 166.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-07-21
Downloads
42 (#533,951)
6 months
6 (#866,322)
2016-07-21
Downloads
42 (#533,951)
6 months
6 (#866,322)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
A Simple Realist Account of the Normativity of Concepts.Elisabetta Lalumera - 2005 - Disputatio 1 (19):1-17.
Externalismo semántico y subdeterminación empírica. Respuesta a un desafío al realismo científico.Marc Jiménez Rolland - 2017 - Dissertation, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana
“The Brain in Vat” at the Intersection. [REVIEW]Danilo Šuster - 2018 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 18 (1):205-217.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-2pm92 dc2