The seriousness of poetry

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/escrit/cgn025

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Incense and insensibility: Austin on the ‘non-seriousness’ of poetry.Maximilian De Gaynesford - 2009 - Ratio 22 (4):464-485.
How wrong can one be?Max de Gaynesford - 1996 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96 (1):387-394.
The mind of Pope Francis: a review article by Professor Max De Gaynesford (t86).Maximilian De Gaynesford - forthcoming - Ampleforth Journal.
How Wrong Can One Be?Max de Gaynesford - 1996 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96 (1):387-394.
How Wrong Can One Be?Max De Gaynesford - 1996 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96 (1):387 - 394.
Reply to Maximilian de Gaynesford.John Mcdowell - 2004 - Theoria 70 (2-3):162-166.
Dimensions: philosophical essays on the nature of music and poetry.Arun Kumar Bhattacharya - 1974 - Calcutta: K. P. Bagchi on behalf of Uttarsuri.
What Light Can Do: Essays on Art, Imagination, and the Natural World.Robert Hass - 2012 - Ecco/Harpercollins.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-21

Downloads
18 (#1,109,160)

6 months
6 (#851,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Max De Gaynesford
University of Reading

Citations of this work

The Performative Limits of Poetry.Christopher Mole - 2013 - British Journal of Aesthetics 53 (1):55-70.
Austin's Method.Hanno Birken-Bertsch - 2014 - In Brian Garvey (ed.), Austin on Language. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 89-107.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references