A philosopher's reply to questions concerning Peirce's theory of signs

Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 62:169-178 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,839

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Coherence: Reply to Gerard Vreeswijk.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):404-406.
Questions and Theses Concerning (Mental) Events and Causation.Pirmin Stekeler-Weithofer - 2000 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 76:195-218.
Kepler, Newton, Einstein and the string theory: Reply to David Atkinson.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):103-105.
Qualitative and quantitative inference to the best theory: Reply to Ilkka Niiniluoto.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):276-280.
Peirce's Semiotics as Complex Inquiry: Conflicting Methods.Roberta Kevelson - 1998 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 62:195-208.
What is the best empirically equivalent theory?: Reply to Igor Douven.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):310-313.
Reply to critics.Ernest Gellner - 1996 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 48:623-686.
Confirmation and truthlikeness: Reply to Gerhard Schurz.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):160-166.
Overdetermination and reference: Reply to Emma Ruttkamp.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):437-439.
'Thisgrue' and 'thisemerald-part': Reply to John Welch.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):138-140.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-27

Downloads
11 (#1,488,982)

6 months
1 (#1,599,003)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references