Freedom and ethical necessity: a Kantian response to Ulrich

In James A. Clarke & Gabriel Gottlieb (eds.), Practical Philosophy From Kant to Hegel: Freedom, Right, and Revolution. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper starts with outlining the problems of determinism presented in Ulrich's Eleuthériologie and then examines what resources are available to Kant to address these problems. Although the initial focus is historical, one of the aims is to show that the problems with determinism continue to be live problems for those who seek to defend Kant's theory. So the attempt to seek resources in Kant to address these problems will also involve an attempt to offer a diagnosis of what is needed for such defenses of Kant to succeed.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bearing the Marks.Jonathan Heaps - 2012 - In Fritz Allhoff & Robert Arp (eds.), Tattoos – Philosophy for Everyone. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 135–147.
Relational Creativity and the Symmetry of Freedom and Nature.Philip Michael Rose - 2005 - Cosmos and History : The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 1 (1):3-16.
Taking Freedom Seriously: Kantian Ethics versus the Ethics of Kant.Bernard Yack - 2023 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 35 (3):233-246.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-28

Downloads
247 (#106,847)

6 months
52 (#100,193)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Katerina Deligiorgi
University of Sussex

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations