- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Medical Sexism: Contraception Access, Reproductive Medicine, and Health Care
Lexington Books (2019)
Abstract
Why do some doctors routinely deny birth control refills without additional tests, and why do some doctors disrespect patient autonomy in decisions about abortions, labor and delivery, organ transplants, and more? This book argues that medical sexism is a major cause of this pervasive mistreatment.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Jill B. Delston, Medical Sexism: Contraception Access, Reproductive Medicine, and Health Care. [REVIEW]Emily McGill - 2021 - Ethics 131 (4):781-785.
Medical Sexism: Contraception Access, Reproductive Medicine, and Health Care. [REVIEW]Codi Stevens - 2021 - Essays in Philosophy 22 (1-2):122-127.
Medical Sexism: Contraception Access, Reproductive Medicine, and Health Care by Jill B. Delston.Deborah McNabb & Lisa Campo-Engelstein - 2021 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 14 (2):200-204.
When doctors deny drugs: Sexism and contraception access in the medical field.J. B. Delston - 2017 - Bioethics 31 (9):703-710.
Islamic medical ethics in the 20th century.V. Rispler-Chaim - 1989 - Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (4):203-208.
Rational non-interventional paternalism: why doctors ought to make judgments of what is best for their patients.J. Savulescu - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (6):327-331.
Using Artificial Intelligence in Patient Care—Some Considerations for Doctors and Medical Regulators.Kanny Ooi - 2024 - Asian Bioethics Review 16 (3):483-499.
Doctors in denial: why big pharma and the Canadian medical profession are too close for comfort.Joel Lexchin - 2017 - Toronto: James Lorimer & Company Ltd., Publishers.
Black-box assisted medical decisions: AI power vs. ethical physician care.Berman Chan - 2023 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 26 (3):285-292.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-08-12
Downloads
14 (#1,279,562)
6 months
3 (#1,473,720)
2019-08-12
Downloads
14 (#1,279,562)
6 months
3 (#1,473,720)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is immoral: The impairment argument.Perry Hendricks - 2019 - Bioethics 33 (2):245-253.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-lv8mh dc2