Not over Yet: Prior's 'Thank Goodness' Argument

Philosophy 66 (256):241 - 243 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0031819100053109

Other Versions

edition Delmas, Kiernan-Lewis (1994) "Not Over Yet: Prior's 'Thank Goodness' Argument". In Oaklander, L. Nathan, Smith, Quentin, The New Theory of Time, pp. 322--327: Yale Up (1994)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Not Over Yet: Prior's ‘Thank Goodness’ Argument.Delmas Kiernan-Lewis - 1991 - Philosophy 66 (256):241-243.
Not Over Yet: Prior's ‘Thank Goodness’ Argument.Kiernan Delmas-Lewis - 1991 - Philosophy 66 (256):241-243.
Prior's 'Thank Goodness' Argument: A Reply to Hardin.Delmas Lewis - 1986 - Philosophy 61 (237):404 - 407.
Prior's ‘Thank Goodness’ Argument: A Reply to Hardin.Delmas Lewis - 1986 - Philosophy 61 (237):404-407.
Time and Place Logic: A Further Discussion of A. N. Prior's 'Thank Goodness That's over'.G. W. Turner - 1961 - Philosophy 36 (138):366-367.
Prior's' Thank Goodness that's Over'Objection to the B-theory.Michelle Beer - 2008 - In L. Nathan Oaklander (ed.), The philosophy of time. New York: Routledge.
Prior’s Thank-Goodness Argument Reconsidered.Matt La Vine - 2016 - Synthese 193 (11).
Review: G. W. Turner, Time and Place Logic, a Further Discussion of A. N. Prior's 'Thank Goodness that's over' (XXV 343(3)). [REVIEW]Anthony Anderson - 1971 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 36 (3):518-518.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
98 (#215,368)

6 months
25 (#126,272)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Thank Goodness It's over.L. Nathan Oaklander - 1992 - Philosophy 67 (260):256 - 258.
Leibniz's non-tensed theory of time.Michael J. Futch - 2002 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (2):125 – 139.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references