Coercion, Consent, and Time

Ethics 131 (2):345-368 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article sets out a framework for distinguishing three kinds of norms governing past sexual (mis)conduct and our responses to it: wrongfulness norms, excusability norms, and accountability norms. The framework provides conceptual tools for making sense of (and understanding the limits of) three distinct responses commonly offered by those accused of past sexual misconduct: “But that used to be okay!” “But everybody used to think that was okay!” and “But that was so long ago!”

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-12-17

Downloads
40 (#564,522)

6 months
13 (#265,352)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Exploitation.Alan Wertheimer - 1996 - Princeton University Press.
Yes Means Yes: Consent as Communication.Tom Dougherty - 2015 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 43 (3):224-253.
The Moral Magic of Consent: Heidi M. Hurd.Heidi Hurd - 1996 - Legal Theory 2 (2):121-146.
Seduction, rape, and coercion.Sarah Conly - 2004 - Ethics 115 (1):96-121.

View all 11 references / Add more references