The role of the relatives in opt-in systems of postmortal organ procurement

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (2):195-205 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In almost all opt-in systems of postmortal organ procurement, if the deceased has not made a decision about donation, his relatives will be asked to make it. Can this decision power be justified? I consider three possible justifications. (1) We could presume the deceased to have delegated this power to his relatives. (2) It could be argued that, if the deceased has not made a decision, a proxy decision has to be made in his best interests. (3) The relatives could have a standing of their own because they are singled out from the parties whose interests are being affected by the decision by the special relation they had to the deceased. None of these arguments turns out to be convincing

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,314

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can Consent be Presumed?Govert Den Hartogh - 2011 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (3):295-307.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-03

Downloads
100 (#217,687)

6 months
7 (#469,699)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Relational autonomy, normative authority and perfectionism.Catriona Mackenzie - 2008 - Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (4):512-533.
Consent to Sexual Relations.Alan Wertheimer - 2003 - Cambridge University Press.
Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice.Joel Anderson & Axel Honneth - 2005 - In John Philip Christman & Joel Anderson, Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: New Essays. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 127-149.
Offense to Others.Joel Feinberg - 1984 - Oxford University Press USA.

View all 24 references / Add more references