Belief revision and incongruity: is it a joke?

Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 33 (3-4):467-494 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

‘Incongruity is never superfluous’Thea Arbee (2016) Is the superfluous a (new) modality?11. Even if much has been written about ingredients that trigger laughter, researchers are still far from hav...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conditionals and belief revision.Fjmm Veltman, M. Clarke, J. Delgrande & P. Gärdenfors - 1991 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 1:199-265.
Frontiers of Belief Revision.M. Williams & Hans Rott (eds.) - 2001 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Humour and Incongruity.John Lippitt - 1994 - Cogito 8 (2):147-153.
Semi-revision.Sven Hansson - 1997 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7 (1-2):151-175.
Observations on validity and conditionals in belief revision systems.André Fuhrmann - 1993 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 3 (2):225-238.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-08-22

Downloads
24 (#912,262)

6 months
4 (#1,252,858)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Leviathan.Thomas Hobbes - 1936 - Harmondsworth,: Penguin Books. Edited by C. B. Macpherson.
Two modellings for theory change.Adam Grove - 1988 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 17 (2):157-170.

View all 20 references / Add more references