Supposition and (Statistical) Models

Philosophy of Science:1-12 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a recent paper, Sprenger (2019) advances what he calls a “suppositional” answer to the question of why a Bayesian agent’s degrees of belief should align with the probabilities found in statistical models. We show that Sprenger’s account trades on an ambiguity between hypothetical and subjunctive suppositions and cannot succeed once we distinguish between the two.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,289

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-02-19

Downloads
24 (#1,002,902)

6 months
8 (#525,820)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Corey Dethier
University of Minnesota

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references