Low‐grade two‐dimensionalism [Book Review]

Philosophical Books 48 (1):1-16 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As tends to be the way with philosophical positions, there are at least as many two-dimensionalisms as there are two-dimensionalists. But painting with a broad brush, there are core epistemological and metaphysical commitments which underlie the two-dimensionalist project, commitments for which I have no sympathies. A sketch of three signi?cant points of disagreement.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two Arguments from Sider’s Four-Dimensionalism. [REVIEW]Ned Markosian - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (3):665–673.
The Two‐Dimensionalist Reductio.Robert J. Howell - 2008 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (3):348-358.
Persistence and the Resurrection.Kenneth Hochstetter - 2014 - Philosophia Christi 16 (1):139-154.
The Metaphysical Foundations of Identity Over Time.Jeremy Lewis Buxbaum - 2003 - Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder
Soames’s argument 1 against strong two-dimensionalism.Robert Michels - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 161 (3):403-420.
Temporal parts and moral personhood.Hud Hudson - 1999 - Philosophical Studies 93 (3):299-316.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
336 (#83,870)

6 months
19 (#154,774)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Josh Dever
University of Texas at Austin

References found in this work

Assertion.Robert Stalnaker - 2013 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Peterborough, CA: Broadview Press. pp. 179.
Assertion.Robert Stalnaker - 1978 - Syntax and Semantics (New York Academic Press) 9:315-332.
Two-dimensional semantics.David J. Chalmers - 2006 - In Ernest LePore & Barry C. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

View all 20 references / Add more references