The Distinction between Philosophy of Avicenna and Aristotle, According to the Averroes' Tahafut

Avicennian Philosophy Journal 21 (57):5-26 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Studying Avicenna's philosophy raised three main questions: Is his philosophy the continuation of Aristotle's philosophy? If yes, Can it be considered as the commentary to Aristotle philosophy? If not, what are the differences between his philosophy and the Aristotle's? Applying Averroes' views about Avicenna's philosophy, the present paper is reviewing the differences according to this important commentator of Aristotle- regardless of his critics of Avicenna and the answers to him. The Averroes’s point of view can be considered from three aspects: the phrases that show the differences, the Fundamental principles, and the philosophical details. Averroes believed the philosophy of Avicenna is different from Aristotle's in more than fifty subjects and isn’t the continuation of it.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,072

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-02

Downloads
2 (#1,894,947)

6 months
2 (#1,685,865)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references