A Reply to Professor Margolis

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 34 (2):229 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A reply to professor Margolis.Review author[S.]: George Dickie - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 34 (2):229-231.
A reply to professor Margolis.Roland Puccetti - 1975 - Philosophy of Science 42 (3):281-285.
[Richards on evaluation]: Reply to Dickie.Richard A. Richards - 2005 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (3):285 - 287.
The Origins of Beardsley's Aesthetics.George Dickie - 2005 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (2):175 - 178.
"The Art Circle": A Theory of Art": George Dickie. [REVIEW]Graham Mcfee - 1986 - British Journal of Aesthetics 26 (1):72.
Reply to professor Cebik.B. R. Tilghman - 1994 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 52 (4):464-466.
A Reply to Professor Silvers.Warren E. Steinkraus - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 34 (2):227.
A reply to professor Silvers.Review author[S.]: Warren E. Steinkraus - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 34 (2):227-229.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
35 (#639,350)

6 months
13 (#245,997)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The importance of being an artifact.Douglas F. Stalker - 1979 - Philosophia 8 (4):701-712.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references