Copernicus Contra Kuhn

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 59 (4):126-143 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

T. Kuhn’s theory of scientific revolutions has repeatedly been the subject of criticism. It is important to note that Kuhn pays very limited attention to the phenomenon of the scientific revolution itself, comparing the revolution either with a religious conversion or with a gestalt switch. Such comparisons, however, are very superficial. This paper outlines a new understanding of the scientific revolution as a result of the resonance of the intellectual trends of the early modern period. It was the quasi-simultaneous action of various factors that led to revolutionary changes in natural philosophy, which, in turn, gave rise to the actual scientific revolution. In addition, the article shows that the Copernican Revolution cannot be described within the model of scientific revolution developed by T. Kuhn. Ptolemy’s theory was mathematically constructed so that it could not make inaccurate predictions of planetary motion, because – as we are now clear – the function characterizing the trajectory of planetary motion was actually represented as a Fourier series. The Copernican revolution was not a Kuhn-type scientific revolution, nor was it caused by the empirical failures of Ptolemaic astronomy. Events unfolded according to a different scheme. Copernicus set out to carry out the principle of the uniform circular motion of the planets more consistently than had been done in Ptolemy’s theory, at the same time presenting to this theory those requirements of an aesthetic and methodological order, which the cognitively fragmented system of Ptolemy, for all its flexibility, could not satisfy and, by the conditions of its creation, could not satisfy. In addition, the article shows that Copernicus, in constructing his heliocentric theory, was essentially seeking answers to the challenges that Alberti’s artificial perspective and Nicholas of Cusa’s theological speculation posed to the visual experience in the sixteenth century.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,343

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thomas S. Kuhn a zagadnienie rewolucji kopernikowskiej = Thomas S. Kuhn and the Issue of the Copernican Revolution.Michał Kokowski - 2001 - Warsaw: "Studia Copernicana" vol. 39. Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Historii Nauki PAN..
Thomas Kuhn and the chemical revolution.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2008 - Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2):101-115.
Was There a Crisis before the Copernican Revolution? A Reappraisal of Gingerich's Criticisms of Kuhn.Robert I. Griffiths - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:127 - 132.
Permanent Revolution In Science: A Quantum Epistemology.Steve Fuller - 2021 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 51 (1):48-57.
The Archimedean Revolution of Nicolaus Copernicus.Alberto Bardi - 2023 - Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science 14.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-17

Downloads
31 (#763,697)

6 months
4 (#864,415)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references