Biocentrism and Genetic Engineering

Environmental Values 4 (3):227-239 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I consider the contribution that a biocentric perspective might make to the ethical debate concerning the practice of genetic engineering. I claim that genetic engineering itself raises novel ethical questions, and particularly so when confronted with biocentric sensibilities. I outline the nature of these questions and describe the biocentric basis for them. I suggest that fundamentalist opposition to projects of genetic engineering is unhelpful, but that biocentric claims should now be a feature of ethical consideration. I conclude, though, that while environmental ethicists can contribute powerfully to debates concerning the future of genetic engineering, the ultimate direction it takes is likely to be beyond their control.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intrinsic Value and the Genetic Engineering of Animals.R. B. M. De Vries - 2008 - Environmental Values 17 (3):375 - 392.
Ethical limits to domestication.P. Sandøe, N. Holtug & H. B. Simonsen - 1996 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 9 (2):114-122.
The Evolutionary Biological Implications of Human Genetic Engineering.Russell Powell - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (3):204-225.
Catholicism, the Human Form, and Genetic Engineering.James J. Delaney - 2010 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:75-87.
Catholicism, the Human Form, and Genetic Engineering.James J. Delaney - 2010 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:75-87.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-10

Downloads
78 (#268,218)

6 months
15 (#204,260)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Dobson
Keele University

References found in this work

The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. A summary.Arne Naess - 1973 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 16 (1-4):95 – 100.
Animals and Why They Matter.Mary Midgley - 1985 - Environmental Ethics 7:171-175.
Biotechnology and the environment: What is at risk? [REVIEW]Mark Sagoff - 1988 - Agriculture and Human Values 5 (3):26-35.

Add more references