The constructible and the intelligible in Newton's philosophy of geometry

Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1114-1124 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the preface to the Principia (1687) Newton famously states that “geometry is founded on mechanical practice.” Several commentators have taken this and similar remarks as an indication that Newton was firmly situated in the constructivist tradition of geometry that was prevalent in the seventeenth century. By drawing on a selection of Newton's unpublished texts, I hope to show the faults of such an interpretation. In these texts, Newton not only rejects the constructivism that took its birth in Descartes's Géométrie (1637); he also presents the science of geometry as being more powerful than his Principia remarks may lead us to believe.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,270

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Newton and Proclus: Geometry, imagination, and knowing space.Mary Domski - 2012 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):389-413.
Newton and Hamilton: In defense of truth in algebra.Janet Folina - 2012 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):504-527.
Force and Geometry in Newton's Principia. [REVIEW]Kenneth R. Westphal - 1998 - Review of Metaphysics 51 (4):923-925.
Force and Geometry in Newton's Principia.Curtis Wilson - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (4):636-639.
Geometry and Mechanics in the Preface to Newton’s Principia.Niccolò Guicciardini - 2004 - Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 25 (2):119-159.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
116 (#186,156)

6 months
4 (#1,260,583)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mary Domski
University of New Mexico