Ifs and Cans Revisited

Philosophy 37 (141):245 - 256 (1962)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I shall be principally concerned with three points arising from Professor Austin's British Academy Lecture on ‘Ifs and Cans’. 1 These points only concern that use of ‘can’ where it is used in the general sense of ‘to be able’ and applied to human beings in respect of actual or possible actions. 2 To some extent, of course, the basic problem is simply what sense of ‘can’ it is which is involved when we talk of possible but not actual human actions, i.e. when we say that a person could do or could have done what he does not or did not do

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,317

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Desire And Capacity.Y. N. Chopra - 1973 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3 (September):115-119.
L’ifs And Cans Di Austin: alcune osservazioni sulla forma logica.Nicola Ciprotti - 2002 - Annali Del Dipartimento di Filosofia 8:77-87.
Ifs and cans.J. L. Austin - 1956 - In Austin J. L. (ed.), Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. 42. pp. 109-132.
Ifs and Cans - I.D. F. Pears - 1971 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):249 - 274.
Emotions and Motives.William Lyons - 1976 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (3):501 - 516.
What could Jesus do?H. E. Baber - 2023 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 94 (3):347-355.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
41 (#538,867)

6 months
8 (#551,658)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Ifs and Cans - I.D. F. Pears - 1971 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):249 - 274.
A Theory of Free Human Action.Michael John Zimmerman - 1979 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references