In Defense of George Dickie

The Journal of Aesthetic Education 16 (2):55 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/3332277

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

"Art and the Aesthetic": George Dickie. [REVIEW]Robert J. Yanal - 1976 - British Journal of Aesthetics 16 (2):174.
Institutions of Art: Reconsiderations of George Dickie's Philosophy.Robert J. Yanal (ed.) - 1993 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
Dickie and Cohen on What Art Is.V. Mendenhall - 1982 - The Journal of Aesthetic Education 16 (2):41.
Dickie: Defining Art and Falsifying Dada.Roger Nash - 1981 - The Journal of Aesthetic Education 15 (3):107.
"Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis," by George Dickie. [REVIEW]Maurice B. McNamee - 1976 - Modern Schoolman 54 (1):75-77.
Hume's principles of taste: A reply to Dickie.James Shelley - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):84-89.
George Dickie, Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, l974, 204pp., $9.50. [REVIEW]James J. Fletcher - 1977 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 4 (1):85-90.
Why ‘art’ doesn't have two senses.M. W. Rowe - 1991 - British Journal of Aesthetics 31 (3):214-221.
Ethics and aesthetics: Replies to Dickie, Stecker, and Livingston.Noël Carroll - 2006 - British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (1):82-95.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
13 (#1,318,762)

6 months
6 (#851,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references