Teleology, Perfectionism, and Communitarianism in Aristotle's Political Naturalism

Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aristotle's political naturalism is represented in his primary discussion of Politics I.2, where he advances three striking claims. The claims are: The polis, or city-state, exists by nature . A human is by nature a political animal . The polis is by nature prior to the individual . These claims are difficult to interpret because they appear to contradict assertions Aristotle makes in other areas of his philosophy. The arguments for these claims are also difficult to interpret, and the efficacy of the arguments in defending the claims is in question. Furthermore, later political philosophers have rejected the concept of political naturalism . ;I argue that the first claim is only apparently contradictory because the polis is sui generis. The polis does not belong in any of Aristotle's categories. I also argue that its correct interpretation derives from Aristotle's natural teleology. ;I argue that Aristotle's second claim is tightly connected to his views in the Nicomachean Ethics on human nature. To that end, I defend an interpretation of the second claim in light of Aristotle's perfectionism. Aristotle's version of perfectionism is that a 'good' human attains a measure of excellence in terms of virtues unique to human life. Thus I argue that according to Aristotle, the best way for a human to become virtuous is to live within the polis. ;The correct interpretation of the third claim draws on Aristotle's concepts of priority, homonymy, and function. Aristotle uses the word 'prior' in this claim to indicate that the polis can exist without any particular individual, but that the individual cannot exist without the polis. However, Aristotle does not believe that a person will literally die outside the polis. He thinks that a person will not live well and will not fulfill her function as a human being outside the polis. Because of the third claim, scholars have accused Aristotle of totalitarianism. I argue that this accusation stems from a misinterpretation of the claim. The correct interpretation is that Aristotle was communitarian

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,665

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nature and Politics.Fred D. Miller - 1995 - In Fred Dycus Miller (ed.), Nature, Justice, and Rights in Aristotle's Politics. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Argumentos de Aristóteles para sua antropologia política e a existência natural da polis.Knoll Manuel - 2023 - Journal of Teleological Science 3 (3):50-80. Translated by Salles Sergio.
Does Aristotle's Polis Exist 'By Nature'?Goerner Cherry - 2006 - History of Political Thought 27 (4):563-585.
Does Aristotle's polis exist 'by nature'?K. Cherry & E. A. Goerner - 2006 - History of Political Thought 27 (4):563-585.
Aristotle’s Arguments for his Political Anthropology and the Natural Existence of the Polis.Manuel Dr Knoll - 2017 - In Refik Guremen & Annick Julin (eds.), Aristote, L’animal politique. Publications de la Sorbonne. pp. 31–57.
Aristotle's Political Philosophy.David Keyt - 2018 - In Sean D. Kirkland & Eric Sanday (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press. pp. 393–412.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references