Berkeley and Mandeville: Religion and morality

Filosofia Unisinos 12 (1):56-69 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this text is to analyze the debate between Berkeley’s Alciphron and Mandeville’s The fable of the bees and Letter to Dion, focusing on the questions indirectly raised by Berkeley to his opponent: Would there be a place for religion in Mandeville’s society or in his social, political and economic system? If so, what role would it play? Without religion, on what foundations would morality in social life be based? Key words: Berkeley, Mandeville, morality.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
64 (#362,448)

6 months
2 (#1,359,420)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Antonio Carlos Santos
Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The moral philosophy of George Berkeley.Paul J. Olscamp - 1970 - The Hague,: Martinus Nijhoff.
Bernard Mandeville and the Reality of Virtue.John Colman - 1972 - Philosophy 47 (180):125 - 139.
Ethics and Politics in Mandeville.J. C. Maxwell - 1951 - Philosophy 26 (98):242 - 252.
Berkeley et le voile des mots.Geneviève Brykman - 1994 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 99 (4):573-574.

View all 11 references / Add more references