Plagiarism in the Sacred Sciences

Philosophy and Theology 32 (1-2):27-61 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article diagnoses the problem of plagiarism in academic books and articles in the disciplines of philosophy and theology. It identifies three impediments to institutional reform. They are: (1) a misplaced desire to preserve personal and institutional reputations; (2) a failure to recognize that attribution in academic writing admits of degrees; and (3) a disproportionate emphasis on the socalled “intention to plagiarize.” A detailed case study provides an illustration of the need for institutional reform in the post-publication processes in the disciplines of philosophy and theology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-07-11

Downloads
853 (#26,838)

6 months
369 (#5,067)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

M. V. Dougherty
Ohio Dominican University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Plagiarism in research.Gert Helgesson & Stefan Eriksson - 2015 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (1):91-101.
Philosophical plagiarism.Sven Ove Hansson - 2008 - Theoria 74 (2):97-101.
Advice for Plagiarism Whistleblowers.Mark Fox & Jeffrey Beall - 2014 - Ethics and Behavior 24 (5):341-349.

View all 8 references / Add more references