Causal loops and the independence of causal facts

Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S89- (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to Hugh Mellor in Real Time II (1998, Ch. 12), assuming the logical independence of causal facts and the 'law of large numbers', causal loops are impossible because if they were possible they would produce inconsistent sets of frequencies. I clarify the argument, and argue that it would be preferable to abandon the relevant independence assumption in the case of causal loops

Other Versions

reprint Dowe, Phil (2001) "Causal Loops and the Independence of Causal Facts". Philosophy of Science 68(S3):S89-S97

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
131 (#168,394)

6 months
14 (#233,812)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Phil Dowe
Australian National University

Citations of this work

Time Travel.Nicholas J. J. Smith - 2012 - In Ed Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Buclele cauzale în călătoria în timp.Nicolae Sfetcu - 2018 - Bucharest, Romania: MultiMedia Publishing.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Physical Causation.Phil Dowe - 2000 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Real Time.D. H. Mellor - 1981 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Time’s arrow and Archimedes’ point.Huw Price - 1996 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):1093-1096.
Causal Asymmetries.Daniel M. Hausman - 1998 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point: New Directions for the Physics of Time.Huw Price - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (1):135-159.

View all 10 references / Add more references