A Response to Parrish on the Fine-Tuning Argument

Philosophia Christi 2 (1):61 - 67 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is response to Stephen Parrish’s article "Theodore Drange on the Fine-Tuning Argument: A Critique," ’Philosophia Christi’, Series 2, 1 (No. 2, 1999), which attacked a section of my book ’Nonbelief and Evil: Two Arguments for God’s Nonexistence’ (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1998). The Fine-Tuning Argument (FTA) maintains that the physical constants of our universe exhibit evidence of "fine-tuning" by an intelligent designer. In opposition, I suggest alternate explanations which are at least as good. Here I defend my objections to FTA against Parrish’s critique, aiming to show that his defense of the argument is a failure

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Reply to Theodore Drange.Stephen E. Parrish - 2000 - Philosophia Christi 2 (1):69 - 74.
The fine-tuning argument.Neil A. Manson - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (1):271-286.
Fine-Tuning the Multiverse.Thomas Metcalf - 2018 - Faith and Philosophy 35 (1):3-32.
Fine-Tuning the Multiverse in advance.Thomas Metcalf - 2018 - Faith and Philosophy 35 (1).
Four (Or So) New Fine-Tuning Arguments.Lydia McGrew - 2016 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 8 (2):85--106.
The teleological argument.Robin Collins - 2007 - In Paul Copan & Chad Meister (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: Classic and Contemporary Issues. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 202–281.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-17

Downloads
31 (#735,444)

6 months
5 (#1,067,832)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Theodore Drange
West Virginia University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references