The Scottish Enlightenment and Hegel’s Account of “Civil Society” [Book Review]

The Owl of Minerva 22 (2):230-234 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It can be useful to sort out the debates over Hegel’s political philosophy in political terms. The early post-war debates took place on essentially liberal grounds, as Hegel’s adherence to free speech and constitutional government had to be defended against cold warriors such as Karl Popper and Sidney Hook. I think it is obvious to everyone that the liberals won. Nevertheless the liberal vision of Hegel gave way to what is really a social-democratic vision - though due to the anachronism and implausibility of calling him a social-democrat, the social-democratic Hegel is called “modern.” The point is that he recognized that capitalism was crisis-prone and that political response was required, yet he had no designs on the private ownership of the means of production, and he would not condone repression. To 20th century ears, Hegel’s position resonates most sympathetically with the position of a social democrat.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
62 (#344,349)

6 months
5 (#1,050,400)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jay Drydyk
Carleton University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references