Dualling: A critique of an argument of Popper and Miller

&
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (2):220-223 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/37.2.220

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

On a recent objection to Popper and Miller's "disproof" of probabilistic induction.Colin Howson - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (4):675-680.
David Miller. A paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 59–61. - Karl R. Popper. A comment on Miller's new paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 61–69. - Karl R. Popper. A paradox of zero information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 141–143. - J. L. Mackie. Miller's so-called paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 144–147. - David Miller. On a so-called so-called paradox: a reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 147–149. - Jeffrey Bub and Michael Radner. Miller's paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 1 , pp. 63–67. - David Miller. The straight and narrow rule of induction: a reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 2, pp. 145. [REVIEW]Richard C. Jeffrey - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127.
In defense of the Popper-Miller argument.Donald Gillies - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (1):110-113.
Review of H. FIELD: Possibility and Reality in Mathematics: A Review of Realism, Mathematics, and Modality; Geoffrey Hellman: Mathematics without Numbers. [REVIEW]Andrew Powell - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (2):245-262.
Epiphenomenalism and Machines: A Discussion of Van Rooijen's Critique of Popper.Davor Pećnjak - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (3):404-408.
A suspicious feature of the popper/miller argument.I. J. Good - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (3):535-536.
Contentious contents: For inductive probability.Andrew Elby - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):193-200.
Partly deductive support in the Popper-Miller argument.Burke Townsend - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (3):490-496.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
156 (#145,319)

6 months
14 (#206,486)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Jon Michael Dunn
PhD: University of Pittsburgh; Last affiliation: Indiana University, Bloomington
Geoffrey Hellman
University of Minnesota

Citations of this work

J. Michael Dunn on Information Based Logics.Katalin Bimbo (ed.) - 2016 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Partly deductive support in the Popper-Miller argument.Burke Townsend - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (3):490-496.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references